RisingTransfers

R. James vs Leonardo Rivas

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

R. James leads in pass accuracy %. Leonardo Rivas is stronger in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Leonardo Rivas holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

R. James

Defender
England
N/A
32 years old
Solid Defender
Full profile →
Player B

Leonardo Rivas

Defender
Paraguay
N/A
24 years old
Aerial
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

R. James

A Solid Defender. Statistically, he stands out as uses long balls frequently (5.6/90) and active off the ball (2.0 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Leonardo Rivas

A Reading Defender. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.5 tackles/90), commanding in the air (4.5 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (60% duel success) and active off the ball (2.3 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricR. JamesLeonardo RivasEdge
Goals / 900.030.00
Tackles won / 900.991.12Leonardo
Interceptions / 901.081.37Leonardo
Clearances / 903.624.54Leonardo
Press intensity / 902.032.28Leonardo
Pass accuracy %68.0067.10R.

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — R. James or Leonardo Rivas?

R. James leads in pass accuracy %. Leonardo Rivas is stronger in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Leonardo Rivas holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

R. James has a market value of N/A, while Leonardo Rivas is valued at N/A.

Explore More