RisingTransfers

Rareș Ilie vs Ramón Terrats

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Rareș Ilie commands a higher market value (€5.0M vs €3.0M). Rareș Ilie leads in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Ramón Terrats is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Ramón Terrats holds the statistical edge across 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Rareș Ilie

Midfielder
Romania
€5.0M
23 years old
Balanced Midfielder
Full profile →
Player B

Ramón Terrats

Midfielder
Spain
€3.0M
25 years old
Balanced Midfielder
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Rareș Ilie

Rareş Ilie is a Balanced Midfielder. Well-rounded midfielder contributing in multiple phases.

Ramón Terrats

Ramón Terrats Espacio is a Balanced Midfielder. Well-rounded midfielder contributing in multiple phases.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricRareș IlieRamón TerratsEdge
Goals / 900.000.13Ramón
Assists / 900.610.00Rareș
Shots / 900.611.20Ramón
Key passes / 901.640.93Rareș
Passes (final 3rd) / 903.21
Tackles won / 901.61
Interceptions / 900.611.20Ramón
Press intensity / 900.142.29Ramón
Pass accuracy %73.40100.00Ramón

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Rareș Ilie or Ramón Terrats?

Rareș Ilie commands a higher market value (€5.0M vs €3.0M). Rareș Ilie leads in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Ramón Terrats is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Ramón Terrats holds the statistical edge across 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Rareș Ilie has a market value of €5.0M, while Ramón Terrats is valued at €3.0M.

Explore More