Rhian Brewster vs David Brooks
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
David Brooks commands a higher market value (€12.0M vs €2.6M). Rhian Brewster leads in goals / 90. David Brooks is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, David Brooks holds the statistical edge across 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a regular goalscorer (0.39 goals/90).
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as naturally left-footed, an elite creator (1.9 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.5 shots/90), a reliable supplier (0.22 assists/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.60 big chances/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Rhian Brewster | David Brooks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.39 | 0.07 | Rhian |
| Assists / 90 | 0.13 | 0.23 | David |
| Shots / 90 | 1.80 | 3.45 | David |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.96 | 1.87 | David |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 3.32 | 4.58 | David |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.42 | 0.78 | David |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.60 | 1.98 | David |
| Pass accuracy % | 74.00 | 77.70 | David |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Rhian Brewster or David Brooks?
David Brooks commands a higher market value (€12.0M vs €2.6M). Rhian Brewster leads in goals / 90. David Brooks is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, David Brooks holds the statistical edge across 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Rhian Brewster has a market value of €2.6M, while David Brooks is valued at €12.0M.