Club PK
Telstar vs Crystal Palace
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 47–53 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Hardeveld has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Hardeveld carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Timber has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Hardeveld still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Hardeveld
Preview · read-only
Hardeveld
Market value (€)
Timber
Hardeveld
Season goals
Timber
Hardeveld
Goals / 90
Timber
Timber edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 7.18 |
| 7.16 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.18 | 0.14 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.21 | 0.34 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 0.82 | 1.57 |
| DNA & style | Dribbles · league rank | Beats 34% | Top 24% |
| DNA & style | Shots · league rank | Beats 24% | Top 37% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 20% | Top 42% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.