Same role PK
Same role · per-90 matched
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round. Market value: Alex Scott €40.0M vs Philip Billing €16.5M.
Scott has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Scott carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Scott has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Billing still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Scott
Preview · read-only
Scott
Market value (€)
Billing
Scott
Season goals
Billing
Scott
Goals / 90
Billing
Billing edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Scott looks stronger on value — fee, trend, or goal efficiency.
| Season rating |
| 6.99 |
| 7.14 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.09 | 0.13 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.03 | 0.26 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 1.38 | 0.64 |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Beats 41% | Top 5% |
| DNA & style | Key passes · league rank | Beats 36% | Top 13% |
| DNA & style | Assists · league rank | Beats 23% | Top 28% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
