Odise Roshi vs Koki Ogawa
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Odise Roshi leads in assists / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. Koki Ogawa is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Odise Roshi holds the statistical edge across 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.27 goals/90) and a prolific assist provider (0.27 assists/90).
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.1 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.57 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.21 assists/90), strong in aerial duels (4.7 aerials won/90) and top 10% scorer in the league.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Odise Roshi | Koki Ogawa | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.28 | 0.57 | Koki |
| Assists / 90 | 0.28 | 0.21 | Odise |
| Shots / 90 | 1.96 | 3.08 | Koki |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.03 | 1.29 | Koki |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 3.11 | 2.10 | Odise |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.31 | 0.45 | Odise |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.87 | 0.67 | Odise |
| Pass accuracy % | 74.20 | 51.90 | Odise |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Odise Roshi or Koki Ogawa?
Odise Roshi leads in assists / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. Koki Ogawa is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Odise Roshi holds the statistical edge across 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Odise Roshi has a market value of €500K, while Koki Ogawa is valued at N/A.