Oliver Jones vs Lukas Kirkegaard
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Oliver Jones leads in clearances / 90 and pass accuracy %. Lukas Kirkegaard is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.2 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (64% duel success), blocks shots courageously (1.5 blocks/90) and uses long balls frequently (5.4/90).
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.8 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (64% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (8.9 final-third passes/90) and uses long balls frequently (8.4/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Oliver Jones | Lukas Kirkegaard | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.08 | Lukas |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.75 | 0.80 | Lukas |
| Clearances / 90 | 5.25 | 4.59 | Oliver |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.19 | 1.82 | Lukas |
| Pass accuracy % | 88.20 | 85.50 | Oliver |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Oliver Jones or Lukas Kirkegaard?
Oliver Jones leads in clearances / 90 and pass accuracy %. Lukas Kirkegaard is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Oliver Jones has a market value of €240K, while Lukas Kirkegaard is valued at N/A.