RisingTransfers

Olaf Gorter vs Taras Stepanenko

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Olaf Gorter leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Taras Stepanenko is stronger in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Olaf Gorter

Midfielder
Netherlands
N/A
21 years old
Defensive
Full profile →
Player B

Taras Stepanenko

Midfielder
Ukraine
N/A
36 years old
Defensive
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Olaf Gorter

A Ball-Winner. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (2.8 tackles/90) and wins the physical battle (64% duel success).

Taras Stepanenko

A Ball-Winner. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (2.5 tackles/90), wins the physical battle (56% duel success) and wins the ball cleanly (2.0 successful tackles/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricOlaf GorterTaras StepanenkoEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Assists / 900.000.00
Shots / 900.580.34Olaf
Key passes / 900.430.00Olaf
Passes (final 3rd) / 903.91
Tackles won / 902.04
Interceptions / 900.871.19Taras
Press intensity / 900.271.88Taras
Pass accuracy %80.1083.50Taras

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Olaf Gorter or Taras Stepanenko?

Olaf Gorter leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Taras Stepanenko is stronger in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Olaf Gorter has a market value of N/A, while Taras Stepanenko is valued at N/A.

Explore More