Nemanja Tekijaski vs Jordy Gillekens
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Nemanja Tekijaski leads in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. Jordy Gillekens is stronger in interceptions / 90. Overall, Nemanja Tekijaski holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (6.4 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (67% duel success), dominant in the air (3.4 aerials won/90, 68%), uses long balls frequently (6.7/90) and active off the ball (2.3 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.1 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (63% duel success), dominant in the air (3.1 aerials won/90, 67%) and uses long balls frequently (12.4/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Nemanja Tekijaski | Jordy Gillekens | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.15 | 0.04 | Nemanja |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.15 | 1.20 | Jordy |
| Clearances / 90 | 6.77 | 5.33 | Nemanja |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.29 | 0.98 | Nemanja |
| Pass accuracy % | 80.90 | 40.00 | Nemanja |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Nemanja Tekijaski or Jordy Gillekens?
Nemanja Tekijaski leads in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. Jordy Gillekens is stronger in interceptions / 90. Overall, Nemanja Tekijaski holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Nemanja Tekijaski has a market value of €200K, while Jordy Gillekens is valued at N/A.