RisingTransfers

Nikola Cumic vs Romano Postema

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Romano Postema is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Romano Postema holds the statistical edge across 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Nikola Cumic

Attacker
Serbia
€1.5M
27 years old
Forward
Full profile →
Player B

Romano Postema

Attacker
Netherlands
N/A
24 years old
Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Nikola Cumic

A Forward.

Romano Postema

A Forward.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricNikola CumicRomano PostemaEdge
Goals / 900.000.69Romano
Assists / 900.000.23Romano
Shots / 900.803.31Romano
Key passes / 900.000.77Romano
Passes (final 3rd) / 900.00
Tackles won / 900.00
Press intensity / 900.190.83Romano
Pass accuracy %54.8078.60Romano

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Nikola Cumic or Romano Postema?

Romano Postema is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Romano Postema holds the statistical edge across 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Nikola Cumic has a market value of €1.5M, while Romano Postema is valued at N/A.

Explore More