RisingTransfers

Nathan Patterson vs Mats Rots

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Nathan Patterson leads in clearances / 90 and pass accuracy %. Mats Rots is stronger in goals / 90 and tackles won / 90. Overall, Mats Rots holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Nathan Patterson

Defender
Scotland
€10.0M
24 years old
Active Full-Back
Full profile →
Player B

Mats Rots

Defender
Netherlands
N/A
20 years old
Active Full-Back
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Nathan Patterson

Nathan Patterson is a Active Full-Back. Wide defender contributing to attacks.

Mats Rots

A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.5 key passes/90), active in the tackle (2.3 tackles/90), central to possession (70 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (5.8/90) and a high-intensity presser (press score 3.1/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricNathan PattersonMats RotsEdge
Goals / 900.000.10Mats
Tackles won / 901.511.65Mats
Interceptions / 900.751.17Mats
Clearances / 906.381.98Nathan
Press intensity / 902.673.12Mats
Pass accuracy %79.2077.50Nathan

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Nathan Patterson or Mats Rots?

Nathan Patterson leads in clearances / 90 and pass accuracy %. Mats Rots is stronger in goals / 90 and tackles won / 90. Overall, Mats Rots holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Nathan Patterson has a market value of €10.0M, while Mats Rots is valued at N/A.

Explore More