Noah Naujoks vs Fisnik Isaki
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Noah Naujoks leads in shots / 90 and interceptions / 90. Fisnik Isaki is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.36 goals/90) and active in the tackle (2.0 tackles/90).
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.24 goals/90), a dynamic dribbler (2.3/90), meticulous in distribution (89% pass accuracy) and heavily involved in play (53 touches/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Noah Naujoks | Fisnik Isaki | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.36 | 0.32 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.04 | 0.11 | Fisnik |
| Shots / 90 | 2.48 | 2.24 | Noah |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.04 | 1.17 | Fisnik |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 4.07 | — | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.98 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.84 | 0.64 | Noah |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.74 | 1.63 | Noah |
| Pass accuracy % | 68.90 | 85.70 | Fisnik |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Noah Naujoks or Fisnik Isaki?
Noah Naujoks leads in shots / 90 and interceptions / 90. Fisnik Isaki is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Noah Naujoks has a market value of N/A, while Fisnik Isaki is valued at N/A.