RisingTransfers

Nemanja Mihajlović vs Bilal Ould-Chikh

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Nemanja Mihajlović leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Bilal Ould-Chikh is stronger in shots / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Nemanja Mihajlović

Attacker
Serbia
€450K
30 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →
Player B

Bilal Ould-Chikh

Attacker
Netherlands
N/A
28 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Nemanja Mihajlović

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (2.0 key passes/90), a prolific assist provider (0.54 assists/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.54 big chances/90).

Bilal Ould-Chikh

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.9 key passes/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.55 big chances/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricNemanja MihajlovićBilal Ould-ChikhEdge
Goals / 900.130.00Nemanja
Assists / 900.540.11Nemanja
Shots / 901.341.42Bilal
Key passes / 902.011.85Nemanja
Press intensity / 900.191.19Bilal
Pass accuracy %66.3078.90Bilal

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Nemanja Mihajlović or Bilal Ould-Chikh?

Nemanja Mihajlović leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Bilal Ould-Chikh is stronger in shots / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Nemanja Mihajlović has a market value of €450K, while Bilal Ould-Chikh is valued at N/A.

Explore More