RisingTransfers

Nemanja Matic vs Marten de Roon

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Marten de Roon commands a higher market value (€3.5M vs €1.8M). Nemanja Matic leads in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. Marten de Roon is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Marten de Roon holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Nemanja Matic

Midfielder
Serbia
€1.8M
37 years old
Metronome
Full profile →
Player B

Marten de Roon

Midfielder
Netherlands
€3.5M
35 years old
Chance Creator
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Nemanja Matic

A Metronome. Statistically, he stands out as naturally left-footed, wins the physical battle (65% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (8.2 final-third passes/90), heavily involved in play (68 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (6.4/90) and active off the ball (2.8 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Marten de Roon

De Roon is the structural glue of a mid-tier side, operating as a high-volume metronome who stabilizes the chaos through sheer physical dominance. While his goal and assist figures are negligible, they mask a ball-progression monster; he ranks in the top 5% of Serie A midfielders for both total passes and passes into the final third, moving the needle far more than his "destroyer" reputation suggests.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricNemanja MaticMarten de RoonEdge
Goals / 900.000.05Marten
Assists / 900.000.05Marten
Shots / 900.470.43
Key passes / 900.660.81Marten
Passes (final 3rd) / 908.5610.00Marten
Tackles won / 901.111.52Marten
Interceptions / 901.230.92Nemanja
Press intensity / 902.842.19Nemanja
Pass accuracy %84.1085.50Marten

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Nemanja Matic or Marten de Roon?

Marten de Roon commands a higher market value (€3.5M vs €1.8M). Nemanja Matic leads in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. Marten de Roon is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Marten de Roon holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Nemanja Matic has a market value of €1.8M, while Marten de Roon is valued at €3.5M.

Explore More