Nile John vs Jacob Andersen
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Nile John leads in shots / 90 and interceptions / 90. Jacob Andersen is stronger in key passes / 90. Overall, Nile John holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90) and meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy).
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90), heavily involved in play (52 touches/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.3/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Nile John | Jacob Andersen | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.16 | 0.19 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 1.92 | 0.48 | Nile |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.64 | 0.73 | Jacob |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.80 | 0.73 | Nile |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.52 | 0.64 | Nile |
| Pass accuracy % | — | 80.50 | — |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Nile John or Jacob Andersen?
Nile John leads in shots / 90 and interceptions / 90. Jacob Andersen is stronger in key passes / 90. Overall, Nile John holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Nile John has a market value of N/A, while Jacob Andersen is valued at N/A.