Nathan De Cat vs Mads Bomholt
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Mads Bomholt is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Mads Bomholt holds the statistical edge across 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90), active in the tackle (2.1 tackles/90), heavily involved in play (53 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.5 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.18 assists/90), active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90), heavily involved in play (67 touches/90) and active off the ball (3.0 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Nathan De Cat | Mads Bomholt | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.08 | 0.12 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.16 | 0.18 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 0.95 | 1.30 | Mads |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.95 | 1.37 | Mads |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 6.71 | — | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.12 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.20 | 1.16 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.50 | 2.96 | Mads |
| Pass accuracy % | 80.40 | 82.30 | Mads |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Nathan De Cat or Mads Bomholt?
Mads Bomholt is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Mads Bomholt holds the statistical edge across 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Nathan De Cat has a market value of N/A, while Mads Bomholt is valued at N/A.