Mehtab Singh vs Cornelius Olsson
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Mehtab Singh leads in pass accuracy %. Cornelius Olsson is stronger in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as meticulous in distribution (92% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (82% duel success), heavily involved in possession (70 passes/90), central to possession (79 touches/90) and uses long balls frequently (5.2/90).
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.9 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (92% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (60% duel success), heavily involved in possession (73 passes/90), central to possession (87 touches/90) and uses long balls frequently (7.0/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Mehtab Singh | Cornelius Olsson | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.04 | 0.00 | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.78 | 0.81 | — |
| Clearances / 90 | 4.22 | 6.30 | Cornelius |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.81 | 1.91 | Cornelius |
| Pass accuracy % | 91.80 | 89.60 | Mehtab |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Mehtab Singh or Cornelius Olsson?
Mehtab Singh leads in pass accuracy %. Cornelius Olsson is stronger in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Mehtab Singh has a market value of €313K, while Cornelius Olsson is valued at N/A.