Club PK
Aalborg BK vs Viborg FF
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Mees Hoedemakers edges this comparison 37–63 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict.
Hoedemakers has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Hoedemakers carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Hoedemakers has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Bonde still answers in theirs.
Hoedemakers edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Pick
I'm backing Bonde
Preview · read-only
Bonde
Season goals
Hoedemakers
Bonde
Goals / 90
Hoedemakers
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 6.77 |
| 6.84 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 0.00 | 1.93 |
| DNA & style | Goals · league rank | Beats 0% | Top 10% |
| DNA & style | Shots · league rank | Beats 0% | Top 19% |
| DNA & style | Dribbles · league rank | Beats 0% | Top 21% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
