Clinton Mata vs Marvin Park — stats comparison PK

Round 1: Basics

Mata has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.

• Age: Clinton Mata 33 · Marvin Park 25
• Market value (€): Clinton Mata €3.0M · Marvin Park €2.0M
• Appearances (season): Clinton Mata 32 · Marvin Park 9
• Minutes played: Clinton Mata 2836.00 · Marvin Park 2277.00
• Avg rating: Clinton Mata 6.79 · Marvin Park 6.96

Round 2: Recent form

Mata carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.

Last 10 matches

• Avg rating (last 10): Clinton Mata 6.69 · Marvin Park —
• Apps (last 10): Clinton Mata 10 · Marvin Park 0
• Tackles won (last 10): Clinton Mata 5 · Marvin Park 0
• Interceptions (last 10): Clinton Mata 15 · Marvin Park 0
• Clearances (last 10): Clinton Mata 38 · Marvin Park 0

This season

• Tackles won / 90: Clinton Mata 0.64 · Marvin Park —
• Interceptions / 90: Clinton Mata 0.98 · Marvin Park 1.53
• Clearances / 90: Clinton Mata 4.63 · Marvin Park 3.05
• Season assists: Clinton Mata 0 · Marvin Park 1
• Season appearances: Clinton Mata 32.00 · Marvin Park 9.00

Round 3: Per-90 comparison

Mata has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Park still answers in theirs.

• Passes / 90: Clinton Mata 58.42 · Marvin Park 37.25
• Tackles won / 90: Clinton Mata 0.64 · Marvin Park —
• Interceptions / 90: Clinton Mata 0.98 · Marvin Park 1.53
• Clearances / 90: Clinton Mata 4.63 · Marvin Park 3.05
• Aerials won / 90: Clinton Mata 2.25 · Marvin Park 0.70
• Ball recovery / 90: Clinton Mata 3.57 · Marvin Park —
• Press intensity / 90: Clinton Mata 1.88 · Marvin Park 2.41
• Pass accuracy %: Clinton Mata 90.3 · Marvin Park 85.1

Round 4: DNA & style

Park edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.

• Press · league rank: Clinton Mata Beats 19% · Marvin Park Top 8%