Matus Vojtko vs Thomas Gundelund
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Matus Vojtko leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Thomas Gundelund is stronger in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Solid Defender. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (1.8 tackles/90), commanding in the air (4.0 clearances/90), penetrates with forward passing (10.5 final-third passes/90) and uses long balls frequently (5.4/90).
A Solid Defender. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (1.9 tackles/90), wins the physical battle (58% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (9.4 final-third passes/90), uses long balls frequently (7.3/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Matus Vojtko | Thomas Gundelund | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.08 | 0.00 | Matus |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.67 | 0.13 | Matus |
| Clearances / 90 | 3.75 | 2.83 | Matus |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.86 | 2.08 | Thomas |
| Pass accuracy % | 74.30 | 76.90 | Thomas |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Matus Vojtko or Thomas Gundelund?
Matus Vojtko leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Thomas Gundelund is stronger in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Matus Vojtko has a market value of €200K, while Thomas Gundelund is valued at N/A.