RisingTransfers

Mike te Wierik vs S. Wæver

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Mike te Wierik leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. S. Wæver is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Mike te Wierik holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Mike te Wierik

Defender
Netherlands
N/A
33 years old
Physical Stopper
Full profile →
Player B

S. Wæver

Defender
Denmark
N/A
30 years old
Physical Stopper
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Mike te Wierik

A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (1.9 tackles/90) and wins the physical battle (65% duel success).

S. Wæver

A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (3.5 tackles/90), wins the physical battle (62% duel success), wins the ball cleanly (2.2 successful tackles/90), active off the ball (2.4 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions and top 10% tackler in the league.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricMike te WierikS. WæverEdge
Goals / 900.070.00Mike
Tackles won / 901.47
Interceptions / 900.910.56Mike
Clearances / 903.833.06Mike
Press intensity / 901.792.35S.
Pass accuracy %85.8075.60Mike

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Mike te Wierik or S. Wæver?

Mike te Wierik leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. S. Wæver is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Mike te Wierik holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Mike te Wierik has a market value of N/A, while S. Wæver is valued at N/A.

Explore More