Mats Rots vs Zeki Yavru
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Mats Rots leads in goals / 90 and tackles won / 90. Zeki Yavru is stronger in clearances / 90 and pass accuracy %. Overall, Mats Rots holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.5 key passes/90), active in the tackle (2.3 tackles/90), central to possession (70 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (5.8/90) and a high-intensity presser (press score 3.1/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up.
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.4 key passes/90), wins the physical battle (55% duel success), uses long balls frequently (5.8/90) and active off the ball (2.0 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Mats Rots | Zeki Yavru | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.10 | 0.00 | Mats |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.65 | 1.22 | Mats |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.17 | 1.07 | Mats |
| Clearances / 90 | 1.98 | 2.28 | Zeki |
| Press intensity / 90 | 3.12 | 2.03 | Mats |
| Pass accuracy % | 77.50 | 86.50 | Zeki |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Mats Rots or Zeki Yavru?
Mats Rots leads in goals / 90 and tackles won / 90. Zeki Yavru is stronger in clearances / 90 and pass accuracy %. Overall, Mats Rots holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Mats Rots has a market value of N/A, while Zeki Yavru is valued at N/A.