Club PK
FC Groningen vs FC Eindhoven
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 49–51 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Rente has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Recent output is balanced — form does not separate them cleanly.
Renfrum has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Rente still answers in theirs.
Renfrum edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
I'm backing Rente
Preview · read-only
Rente
Season goals
Renfrum
Rente
Goals / 90
Renfrum
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 3.73 |
| 5.52 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 33.54 | 36.71 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | 1.15 | — |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 1.10 | 1.30 |
| DNA & style | Dribbles past · league rank | Beats 29% | Top 1% |
| DNA & style | clearances · league rank | Beats 41% | Top 26% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 24% | Beats 1% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
