Marek Mroz vs David van der Werff
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Marek Mroz leads in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. David van der Werff is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.75 big chances/90) and heavily involved in play (54 touches/90).
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (2.0 key passes/90), active in the tackle (2.0 tackles/90), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.54 big chances/90) and top 20% creator in the league.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Marek Mroz | David van der Werff | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.09 | 0.09 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.05 | 0.09 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 2.08 | 2.43 | David |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.56 | 1.98 | David |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | — | 4.98 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 1.20 | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.71 | 0.63 | Marek |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.22 | 1.69 | David |
| Pass accuracy % | 85.20 | 69.00 | Marek |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Marek Mroz or David van der Werff?
Marek Mroz leads in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. David van der Werff is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Marek Mroz has a market value of €150K, while David van der Werff is valued at N/A.