RisingTransfers

Mohamed Ismail vs John Neeskens

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Mohamed Ismail leads in press intensity / 90. John Neeskens is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, John Neeskens holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Mohamed Ismail

Defender
Egypt
€868K
26 years old
Ball-Playing CB
Full profile →
Player B

John Neeskens

Defender
United States
N/A
32 years old
Aerial
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Mohamed Ismail

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as wins the physical battle (62% duel success), uses long balls frequently (7.2/90) and active off the ball (2.0 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

John Neeskens

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.3 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (55% duel success) and uses long balls frequently (10.6/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricMohamed IsmailJohn NeeskensEdge
Goals / 900.000.08John
Tackles won / 901.09
Interceptions / 900.781.09John
Clearances / 903.464.04John
Press intensity / 902.051.95Mohamed
Pass accuracy %82.3084.50John

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Mohamed Ismail or John Neeskens?

Mohamed Ismail leads in press intensity / 90. John Neeskens is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, John Neeskens holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Mohamed Ismail has a market value of €868K, while John Neeskens is valued at N/A.

Explore More