RisingTransfers

Marcel Hoffmeier vs Boyd Reith

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Marcel Hoffmeier leads in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. Boyd Reith is stronger in interceptions / 90. Overall, Marcel Hoffmeier holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Marcel Hoffmeier

Defender
Germany
N/A
26 years old
Ball-Playing CB
Full profile →
Player B

Boyd Reith

Defender
Netherlands
N/A
27 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Marcel Hoffmeier

Marcel Hoffmeier is a Ball-Playing CB. Progressive defender comfortable on the ball.

Boyd Reith

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.5 key passes/90), an aggressive ball-winner (3.0 tackles/90), wins the physical battle (59% duel success), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (1.04 big chances/90), central to possession (81 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (5.9/90) and top 10% tackler in the league.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricMarcel HoffmeierBoyd ReithEdge
Goals / 900.330.13Marcel
Interceptions / 901.671.75Boyd
Clearances / 903.672.28Marcel
Press intensity / 900.580.53
Pass accuracy %86.5079.70Marcel

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Marcel Hoffmeier or Boyd Reith?

Marcel Hoffmeier leads in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. Boyd Reith is stronger in interceptions / 90. Overall, Marcel Hoffmeier holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Marcel Hoffmeier has a market value of N/A, while Boyd Reith is valued at N/A.

Explore More