RisingTransfers

Mika Haas vs Konrad Faber

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Mika Haas leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Konrad Faber is stronger in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Mika Haas

Defender
Germany
N/A
20 years old
Active Full-Back
Full profile →
Player B

Konrad Faber

Defender
Germany
N/A
28 years old
Active Full-Back
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Mika Haas

A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as wins the physical battle (58% duel success) and active off the ball (2.6 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Konrad Faber

A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), wins the physical battle (57% duel success), central to possession (71 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.8 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricMika HaasKonrad FaberEdge
Goals / 900.220.00Mika
Interceptions / 900.780.31Mika
Clearances / 901.772.51Konrad
Press intensity / 902.562.76Konrad
Pass accuracy %77.1081.00Konrad

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Mika Haas or Konrad Faber?

Mika Haas leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Konrad Faber is stronger in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Mika Haas has a market value of N/A, while Konrad Faber is valued at N/A.

Explore More