Marcão vs Vitor Reis
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Vitor Reis commands a higher market value (€30.0M vs €12.0M). Marcão leads in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. Vitor Reis is stronger in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Vitor Reis holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as naturally left-footed, commanding in the air (6.5 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy), draws fouls effectively (2.0/90) and uses long balls frequently (5.1/90).
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.6 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (90% pass accuracy) and wins the physical battle (59% duel success).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Marcão | Vitor Reis | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.14 | 0.04 | Marcão |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.38 | 0.84 | Vitor |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.40 | 1.09 | Vitor |
| Clearances / 90 | 6.47 | 5.91 | Marcão |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.53 | 1.93 | Vitor |
| Pass accuracy % | 87.50 | 91.10 | Vitor |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Marcão or Vitor Reis?
Vitor Reis commands a higher market value (€30.0M vs €12.0M). Marcão leads in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. Vitor Reis is stronger in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Vitor Reis holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Marcão has a market value of €12.0M, while Vitor Reis is valued at €30.0M.