Mateo Coronel vs Yassir Zabiri
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Yassir Zabiri commands a higher market value (€4.0M vs €1.7M). Mateo Coronel leads in press intensity / 90. Yassir Zabiri is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Yassir Zabiri holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a constant goal threat (2.5 shots/90) and a regular goalscorer (0.28 goals/90).
A Poacher. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.4 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.55 goals/90) and top 20% scorer in the league.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Mateo Coronel | Yassir Zabiri | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.28 | 0.55 | Yassir |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 2.54 | 3.41 | Yassir |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.88 | 1.23 | Yassir |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 1.18 | 2.05 | Yassir |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.10 | 0.82 | Yassir |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.22 | 1.17 | Mateo |
| Pass accuracy % | 69.90 | 73.50 | Yassir |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Mateo Coronel or Yassir Zabiri?
Yassir Zabiri commands a higher market value (€4.0M vs €1.7M). Mateo Coronel leads in press intensity / 90. Yassir Zabiri is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Yassir Zabiri holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Mateo Coronel has a market value of €1.7M, while Yassir Zabiri is valued at €4.0M.