Ladislav Almasi vs Frederik Hogh

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Ladislav Almasi leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Frederik Hogh is stronger in key passes / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Ladislav Almasi

Attacker
Slovakia
€470K
27 years old
Prolific
Full profile →
Player B

Frederik Hogh

Attacker
Denmark
N/A
30 years old
Prolific
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Ladislav Almasi

A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (4.8 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.60 goals/90), dominant in the air (8.2 aerials won/90, 63%) and top 20% scorer in the league.

Frederik Hogh

A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90), a proven goalscorer (0.44 goals/90) and strong in aerial duels (4.4 aerials won/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricLadislav AlmasiFrederik HoghEdge
Goals / 900.600.44Ladislav
Assists / 900.000.00
Shots / 904.152.20Ladislav
Key passes / 901.381.46Frederik
Press intensity / 900.840.72Ladislav
Pass accuracy %66.7070.40Frederik

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Ladislav Almasi or Frederik Hogh?

Ladislav Almasi leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Frederik Hogh is stronger in key passes / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Ladislav Almasi has a market value of €470K, while Frederik Hogh is valued at N/A.

Explore More