Lucá Williams-Barnett vs Joshua Schwirten
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Lucá Williams-Barnett leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Joshua Schwirten is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Joshua Schwirten holds the statistical edge across 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as a proven goalscorer (1.39 goals/90), a prolific assist provider (0.60 assists/90) and wins the physical battle (69% duel success).
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.4 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (2.8 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.43 goals/90), a prolific assist provider (0.43 assists/90) and top 20% creator in the league.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Lucá Williams-Barnett | Joshua Schwirten | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 1.39 | 0.72 | Lucá |
| Assists / 90 | 0.60 | 0.48 | Lucá |
| Shots / 90 | 1.19 | 3.11 | Joshua |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.40 | 1.44 | Joshua |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.00 | 0.48 | Joshua |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.29 | 1.30 | Joshua |
| Pass accuracy % | 71.40 | 76.10 | Joshua |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Lucá Williams-Barnett or Joshua Schwirten?
Lucá Williams-Barnett leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Joshua Schwirten is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Joshua Schwirten holds the statistical edge across 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Lucá Williams-Barnett has a market value of N/A, while Joshua Schwirten is valued at N/A.