Luka Tunjic vs Gustavo Klismahn
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Luka Tunjic leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Gustavo Klismahn is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (2.3 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.76 big chances/90), active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions and top 10% creator in the league.
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90) and top 20% creator in the league.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Luka Tunjic | Gustavo Klismahn | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.47 | 0.09 | Luka |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.09 | Gustavo |
| Shots / 90 | 2.13 | 0.96 | Luka |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.71 | 1.49 | Gustavo |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 5.69 | 6.27 | Gustavo |
| Tackles won / 90 | 2.34 | 1.34 | Luka |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.24 | 0.79 | Gustavo |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.15 | 1.81 | Luka |
| Pass accuracy % | 83.50 | 69.10 | Luka |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Luka Tunjic or Gustavo Klismahn?
Luka Tunjic leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Gustavo Klismahn is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Luka Tunjic has a market value of N/A, while Gustavo Klismahn is valued at N/A.