Luis Suárez vs Óscar Perea
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Luis Suárez commands a higher market value (€22.0M vs €5.2M). Luis Suárez leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Óscar Perea is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Luis Suárez holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Poacher. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.5 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (4.5 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.94 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90) and top 10% scorer in the league.
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90) and a constant goal threat (2.9 shots/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Luis Suárez | Óscar Perea | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.93 | 0.14 | Luis |
| Assists / 90 | 0.21 | 0.00 | Luis |
| Shots / 90 | 4.55 | 2.86 | Luis |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.55 | 1.00 | Luis |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 1.28 | 1.20 | Luis |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.31 | 0.34 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.76 | 2.06 | Óscar |
| Pass accuracy % | 75.50 | 74.50 | Luis |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Luis Suárez or Óscar Perea?
Luis Suárez commands a higher market value (€22.0M vs €5.2M). Luis Suárez leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Óscar Perea is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Luis Suárez holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Luis Suárez has a market value of €22.0M, while Óscar Perea is valued at €5.2M.