Luc Marijnissen vs Leopold Wurm
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Luc Marijnissen leads in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. Leopold Wurm is stronger in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90), commanding in the air (5.0 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (56% duel success), uses long balls frequently (6.2/90) and active off the ball (2.2 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.4 tackles/90), commanding in the air (5.1 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success) and uses long balls frequently (6.3/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Luc Marijnissen | Leopold Wurm | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.03 | 0.05 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.48 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.18 | 1.42 | Leopold |
| Clearances / 90 | 5.06 | 5.12 | Leopold |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.19 | 1.60 | Luc |
| Pass accuracy % | 83.70 | 76.50 | Luc |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Luc Marijnissen or Leopold Wurm?
Luc Marijnissen leads in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. Leopold Wurm is stronger in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Luc Marijnissen has a market value of €300K, while Leopold Wurm is valued at N/A.