Luka Kulenovic vs Dean Zandbergen
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Luka Kulenovic leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Dean Zandbergen is stronger in key passes / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a constant goal threat (2.7 shots/90), a regular goalscorer (0.28 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.17 assists/90) and dominant in the air (6.5 aerials won/90, 64%).
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (2.7 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.52 goals/90), dominant in the air (5.4 aerials won/90, 61%) and top 10% scorer in the league.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Luka Kulenovic | Dean Zandbergen | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.28 | 0.31 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.17 | 0.10 | Luka |
| Shots / 90 | 2.72 | 2.45 | Luka |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.89 | 1.13 | Dean |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 2.76 | — | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.41 | — | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.21 | 1.28 | Dean |
| Pass accuracy % | 59.80 | 56.50 | Luka |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Luka Kulenovic or Dean Zandbergen?
Luka Kulenovic leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Dean Zandbergen is stronger in key passes / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Luka Kulenovic has a market value of €900K, while Dean Zandbergen is valued at N/A.