RisingTransfers

Kellian van der Kaap vs Robin Ziegele

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Kellian van der Kaap leads in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Robin Ziegele is stronger in goals / 90. Overall, Kellian van der Kaap holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Kellian van der Kaap

Defender
Netherlands
€500K
27 years old
Aerial
Full profile →
Player B

Robin Ziegele

Defender
Germany
N/A
29 years old
Solid Defender
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Kellian van der Kaap

A Reading Defender. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.6 clearances/90), uses long balls frequently (5.5/90) and active off the ball (2.3 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Robin Ziegele

A Solid Defender. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.3 clearances/90) and uses long balls frequently (8.8/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricKellian van der KaapRobin ZiegeleEdge
Goals / 900.000.06Robin
Tackles won / 900.61
Interceptions / 901.240.79Kellian
Clearances / 904.584.30Kellian
Press intensity / 902.331.36Kellian
Pass accuracy %77.8050.00Kellian

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Kellian van der Kaap or Robin Ziegele?

Kellian van der Kaap leads in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Robin Ziegele is stronger in goals / 90. Overall, Kellian van der Kaap holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Kellian van der Kaap has a market value of €500K, while Robin Ziegele is valued at N/A.

Explore More