Keke Topp vs Tim Lemperle
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Tim Lemperle commands a higher market value (€12.0M vs €5.0M). Keke Topp leads in shots / 90 and press intensity / 90. Tim Lemperle is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.3 shots/90), a reliable supplier (0.15 assists/90) and strong in aerial duels (3.2 aerials won/90).
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90) and a regular goalscorer (0.34 goals/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Keke Topp | Tim Lemperle | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.31 | 0.35 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.18 | Tim |
| Shots / 90 | 3.44 | 3.18 | Keke |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.63 | 1.59 | Tim |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 1.71 | 1.73 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.71 | 0.80 | Tim |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.80 | 1.39 | Keke |
| Pass accuracy % | 75.20 | 70.50 | Keke |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Keke Topp or Tim Lemperle?
Tim Lemperle commands a higher market value (€12.0M vs €5.0M). Keke Topp leads in shots / 90 and press intensity / 90. Tim Lemperle is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Keke Topp has a market value of €5.0M, while Tim Lemperle is valued at €12.0M.