RisingTransfers

Kye Rowles vs Derek Cornelius

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Derek Cornelius commands a higher market value (€3.0M vs €715K). Kye Rowles leads in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. Derek Cornelius is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Derek Cornelius holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Kye Rowles

Defender
Australia
€715K
27 years old
Aerial
Full profile →
Player B

Derek Cornelius

Defender
Canada
€3.0M
28 years old
Ball-Playing CB
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Kye Rowles

Kye Rowles is a Ball-Playing CB. Progressive defender comfortable on the ball.

Derek Cornelius

Derek Cornelius is a Ball-Playing CB. Progressive defender comfortable on the ball.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricKye RowlesDerek CorneliusEdge
Goals / 900.100.16Derek
Assists / 900.000.16Derek
Shots / 900.300.81Derek
Key passes / 900.200.16
Passes (final 3rd) / 905.008.21Derek
Tackles won / 900.501.13Derek
Interceptions / 901.901.13Kye
Press intensity / 901.932.46Derek
Pass accuracy %86.1084.80Kye

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Kye Rowles or Derek Cornelius?

Derek Cornelius commands a higher market value (€3.0M vs €715K). Kye Rowles leads in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. Derek Cornelius is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Derek Cornelius holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Kye Rowles has a market value of €715K, while Derek Cornelius is valued at €3.0M.

Explore More