Kazeem Olaigbe vs Cherif Ndiaye
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Kazeem Olaigbe commands a higher market value (€5.0M vs €4.0M). Kazeem Olaigbe leads in shots / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. Cherif Ndiaye is stronger in goals / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90).
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), a proven goalscorer (0.47 goals/90), draws fouls effectively (2.9/90) and top 20% scorer in the league.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Kazeem Olaigbe | Cherif Ndiaye | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.47 | Cherif |
| Assists / 90 | 0.08 | 0.07 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 2.30 | 1.94 | Kazeem |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.07 | 1.27 | Cherif |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 2.88 | 1.49 | Kazeem |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.58 | 0.47 | Kazeem |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.35 | 0.98 | Kazeem |
| Pass accuracy % | 74.10 | 80.80 | Cherif |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Kazeem Olaigbe or Cherif Ndiaye?
Kazeem Olaigbe commands a higher market value (€5.0M vs €4.0M). Kazeem Olaigbe leads in shots / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. Cherif Ndiaye is stronger in goals / 90 and key passes / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Kazeem Olaigbe has a market value of €5.0M, while Cherif Ndiaye is valued at €4.0M.