RisingTransfers

Kai Havertz vs Jovan Milosevic

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Kai Havertz commands a higher market value (€50.0M vs €7.0M). Kai Havertz leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Jovan Milosevic is stronger in goals / 90. Overall, Kai Havertz holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Kai Havertz

Attacker
Germany
€50.0M
26 years old
Target Man
Full profile →
Player B

Jovan Milosevic

Attacker
Serbia
€7.0M
20 years old
Target Man
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Kai Havertz

A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as naturally left-footed, a prolific assist provider (0.39 assists/90) and strong in aerial duels (3.1 aerials won/90).

Jovan Milosevic

A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a proven goalscorer (0.40 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.20 assists/90) and strong in aerial duels (3.2 aerials won/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricKai HavertzJovan MilosevicEdge
Goals / 900.190.83Jovan
Assists / 900.390.28Kai
Shots / 902.320.00Kai
Key passes / 900.970.00Kai
Press intensity / 901.170.97Kai
Pass accuracy %68.30

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Kai Havertz or Jovan Milosevic?

Kai Havertz commands a higher market value (€50.0M vs €7.0M). Kai Havertz leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Jovan Milosevic is stronger in goals / 90. Overall, Kai Havertz holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Kai Havertz has a market value of €50.0M, while Jovan Milosevic is valued at €7.0M.

Explore More