Kenzo Goudmijn vs Svit Seslar
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Kenzo Goudmijn leads in shots / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. Svit Seslar is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Svit Seslar holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (9.1 final-third passes/90) and heavily involved in play (62 touches/90).
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90) and active off the ball (2.5 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Kenzo Goudmijn | Svit Seslar | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.16 | Svit |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.16 | Svit |
| Shots / 90 | 1.41 | 1.30 | Kenzo |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.29 | 1.30 | — |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 8.95 | 3.74 | Kenzo |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.59 | 0.81 | Svit |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.47 | 0.81 | Svit |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.82 | 2.51 | Svit |
| Pass accuracy % | 76.90 | 83.70 | Svit |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Kenzo Goudmijn or Svit Seslar?
Kenzo Goudmijn leads in shots / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. Svit Seslar is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Svit Seslar holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Kenzo Goudmijn has a market value of €820K, while Svit Seslar is valued at N/A.