RisingTransfers

Konrad Faber vs Mika Haas

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Konrad Faber leads in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. Mika Haas is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Konrad Faber

Defender
Germany
N/A
28 years old
Active Full-Back
Full profile →
Player B

Mika Haas

Defender
Germany
N/A
20 years old
Active Full-Back
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Konrad Faber

A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), wins the physical battle (57% duel success), central to possession (71 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.8 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Mika Haas

A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as wins the physical battle (58% duel success) and active off the ball (2.6 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricKonrad FaberMika HaasEdge
Goals / 900.000.22Mika
Interceptions / 900.310.78Mika
Clearances / 902.511.77Konrad
Press intensity / 902.762.56Konrad
Pass accuracy %81.0077.10Konrad

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Konrad Faber or Mika Haas?

Konrad Faber leads in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. Mika Haas is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Konrad Faber has a market value of N/A, while Mika Haas is valued at N/A.

Explore More