Kofi Amoako vs William Madsen
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Kofi Amoako leads in pass accuracy %. William Madsen is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, William Madsen holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (2.7 tackles/90), wins the physical battle (56% duel success), heavily involved in play (53 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.2 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), wins the physical battle (57% duel success), heavily involved in play (57 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.3 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Kofi Amoako | William Madsen | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.23 | William |
| Shots / 90 | 0.77 | 1.62 | William |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.77 | 1.38 | William |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.16 | 1.15 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.17 | 2.34 | William |
| Pass accuracy % | 84.40 | 82.60 | Kofi |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Kofi Amoako or William Madsen?
Kofi Amoako leads in pass accuracy %. William Madsen is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, William Madsen holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Kofi Amoako has a market value of N/A, while William Madsen is valued at N/A.