Jordan Lawrence-Gabriel vs Leopold Wurm
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Jordan Lawrence-Gabriel leads in press intensity / 90. Leopold Wurm is stronger in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Overall, Leopold Wurm holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as wins the physical battle (57% duel success), draws fouls effectively (2.5/90), uses long balls frequently (5.2/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.4 tackles/90), commanding in the air (5.1 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success) and uses long balls frequently (6.3/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Jordan Lawrence-Gabriel | Leopold Wurm | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.10 | 0.05 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.55 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.59 | 1.42 | Leopold |
| Clearances / 90 | 3.37 | 5.12 | Leopold |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.12 | 1.60 | Jordan |
| Pass accuracy % | 66.00 | 76.50 | Leopold |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Jordan Lawrence-Gabriel or Leopold Wurm?
Jordan Lawrence-Gabriel leads in press intensity / 90. Leopold Wurm is stronger in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Overall, Leopold Wurm holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Jordan Lawrence-Gabriel has a market value of €875K, while Leopold Wurm is valued at N/A.