RisingTransfers

Jhon Espinoza vs Jano ter Horst

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Jhon Espinoza leads in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. Jano ter Horst is stronger in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Jhon Espinoza

Defender
N/A
27 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →
Player B

Jano ter Horst

Defender
Germany
N/A
23 years old
Reading Defender
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Jhon Espinoza

A Reading Defender. Statistically, he stands out as reads the game exceptionally (1.6 interceptions/90) and active off the ball (2.2 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Jano ter Horst

A Reading Defender. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.3 tackles/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.6 interceptions/90) and active off the ball (2.2 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricJhon EspinozaJano ter HorstEdge
Goals / 900.000.09Jano
Tackles won / 901.29
Interceptions / 901.611.41Jhon
Clearances / 902.103.38Jano
Press intensity / 902.242.25
Pass accuracy %79.4075.40Jhon

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Jhon Espinoza or Jano ter Horst?

Jhon Espinoza leads in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. Jano ter Horst is stronger in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Jhon Espinoza has a market value of N/A, while Jano ter Horst is valued at N/A.

Explore More