Club PK
Hillerød vs Aarhus Fremad
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Jannik Holmsgaard Pohl edges this comparison 56–44 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict.
Pohl has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Pohl carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Lunding has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Pohl still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Pohl
Preview · read-only
Pohl
Season goals
Lunding
Pohl
Goals / 90
Lunding
Pohl edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Season rating |
| — |
| 6.61 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 2.05 | 1.39 |
| DNA & style | Assists · league rank | Beats 0% | Top 16% |
| DNA & style | Goals · league rank | Beats 0% | Top 26% |
| DNA & style | Tackles · league rank | Top 41% | Beats 0% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
