RisingTransfers

James Scott vs Lyle Foster

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Lyle Foster commands a higher market value (€10.0M vs €1.8M). James Scott leads in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Lyle Foster is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

James Scott

Attacker
Scotland
€1.8M
25 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →
Player B

Lyle Foster

Attacker
South Africa
€10.0M
25 years old
Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

James Scott

A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90) and a prolific assist provider (0.40 assists/90).

Lyle Foster

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a regular goalscorer (0.20 goals/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricJames ScottLyle FosterEdge
Goals / 900.000.20Lyle
Assists / 900.400.13James
Shots / 901.201.31Lyle
Key passes / 901.000.66James
Passes (final 3rd) / 901.46
Tackles won / 900.73
Press intensity / 900.311.44Lyle
Pass accuracy %75.6070.00James

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — James Scott or Lyle Foster?

Lyle Foster commands a higher market value (€10.0M vs €1.8M). James Scott leads in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Lyle Foster is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

James Scott has a market value of €1.8M, while Lyle Foster is valued at €10.0M.

Explore More