Jacob Andersen vs Nile John
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Jacob Andersen leads in key passes / 90. Nile John is stronger in shots / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Nile John holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90), heavily involved in play (52 touches/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.3/90).
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90) and meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Jacob Andersen | Nile John | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.19 | 0.16 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 0.48 | 1.92 | Nile |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.73 | 0.64 | Jacob |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.73 | 0.80 | Nile |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.64 | 1.52 | Nile |
| Pass accuracy % | 80.50 | — | — |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Jacob Andersen or Nile John?
Jacob Andersen leads in key passes / 90. Nile John is stronger in shots / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Nile John holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Jacob Andersen has a market value of N/A, while Nile John is valued at N/A.