Joshua Brendan David Magennis vs Janderson
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Joshua Brendan David Magennis leads in goals / 90 and pass accuracy %. Janderson is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Janderson holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Joshua Brendan David Magennis
Playing Style Profiles
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a proven goalscorer (0.40 goals/90) and strong in aerial duels (6.1 aerials won/90).
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (2.5 shots/90), a regular goalscorer (0.23 goals/90) and strong in aerial duels (4.0 aerials won/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Joshua Brendan David Magennis | Janderson | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.40 | 0.23 | Joshua |
| Assists / 90 | 0.06 | 0.11 | Janderson |
| Shots / 90 | 1.50 | 2.55 | Janderson |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.98 | 1.24 | Janderson |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 2.20 | 2.34 | Janderson |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.07 | 0.70 | Janderson |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.61 | 1.31 | Janderson |
| Pass accuracy % | 62.60 | 51.30 | Joshua |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Joshua Brendan David Magennis or Janderson?
Joshua Brendan David Magennis leads in goals / 90 and pass accuracy %. Janderson is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Janderson holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Joshua Brendan David Magennis has a market value of €225K, while Janderson is valued at N/A.