RisingTransfers

Jesper Lindstrøm vs Alexander Bernhardsson

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Jesper Lindstrøm commands a higher market value (€8.0M vs €3.0M). Jesper Lindstrøm leads in pass accuracy %. Alexander Bernhardsson is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Alexander Bernhardsson holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Jesper Lindstrøm

Attacker
Denmark
€8.0M
26 years old
Inside Forward
Full profile →
Player B

Alexander Bernhardsson

Attacker
Sweden
€3.0M
27 years old
Inside Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Jesper Lindstrøm

Jesper Lindstrøm is a Inside Forward. Wide attacker who cuts inside to score.

Alexander Bernhardsson

Alexander Bernhardsson is a Inside Forward. Wide attacker who cuts inside to score.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricJesper LindstrømAlexander BernhardssonEdge
Goals / 900.000.13Alexander
Assists / 900.000.39Alexander
Shots / 902.022.75Alexander
Key passes / 900.761.70Alexander
Press intensity / 900.160.14
Pass accuracy %67.9062.80Jesper

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Jesper Lindstrøm or Alexander Bernhardsson?

Jesper Lindstrøm commands a higher market value (€8.0M vs €3.0M). Jesper Lindstrøm leads in pass accuracy %. Alexander Bernhardsson is stronger in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Overall, Alexander Bernhardsson holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Jesper Lindstrøm has a market value of €8.0M, while Alexander Bernhardsson is valued at €3.0M.

Explore More